Saturday, May 25, 2013
Kennebec Journal Staff
We can start with the fact that it was definitely not Dec. 25.
This date was not celebrated as the birth of Christ until 354 AD, when Pope Julius I chose this date because it coincided with pagan rituals.
The main purpose was to supplant the pagan holiday with a Christian holiday.
Neither Luke nor Matthew mention a season for when Jesus was born. However, scholarly arguments regarding the realism of shepherds grazing their flock at night during the winter challenge the idea of a winter birth for Jesus.
If you read the Bible carefully, you will recognize that Jesus was actually born in March or April; i.e., at Purim time.
Purim celebrates the spring harvest and so the Roman imperial rulers ordered that taxes be paid to them then and the census be taken at that time when families had to return to their place of registration.
That is why the inns were full, and Jesus's family had to settle for spare emergency accommodations in the stables.
The winter solstice is the real reason for the season and it is such a beautiful gift from God.
No wonder the early Christians in Europe wanted to rejoice in finding a chance to look to the coming of spring and rebirth of their natural world after the cold and snow of the winter.
Louis T. Sigel
Wayne
Tweet
Further Discussion
Here at KJonline.com we value our readers and are committed to growing our community by encouraging you to add to the discussion. To ensure conscientious dialogue we have implemented a strict no-bullying policy. To participate, you must follow our Terms of Use.Questions about the article? Add them below and we’ll try to answer them or do a follow-up post as soon as we can. Technical problems? Email them to us with an exact description of the problem. Make sure to include: