February 25

Reagan's commentary just partisan, right-wing rant

Letter to the Editor

Seldom have I seen such shallow propaganda printed in your newspaper as the commentary by Michael Reagan in the Feb. 16 edition.

His attack on President Barack Obama's State of the Union address was less a commentary than a right-wing rant, something I'd have expected to see in an all-conservative or tea-party publication, not a mainstream newspaper.

I don't have a problem with reading conservative viewpoints, it's all part of the national debate.

The newspaper, however, at least should choose a commentary that has some kind of journalistic merit to it, not a partisan rant by some ideologue who seems to have nothing more going for him than his famous conservative father's last name.

I'm sure Reagan makes a good living trading on his father's name and preaching to the ultra-conservative choir with junk like this, but I expect better judgment from the editors of the newspaper when selecting what to put in the limited space of the opinion page.

Ben Keene

Winslow

Were you interviewed for this story? If so, please fill out our accuracy form

Send question/comment to the editors




Further Discussion

Here at KJonline.com we value our readers and are committed to growing our community by encouraging you to add to the discussion. To ensure conscientious dialogue we have implemented a strict no-bullying policy. To participate, you must follow our Terms of Use.

Questions about the article? Add them below and we’ll try to answer them or do a follow-up post as soon as we can. Technical problems? Email them to us with an exact description of the problem. Make sure to include:
  • Type of computer or mobile device your are using
  • Exact operating system and browser you are viewing the site on (TIP: You can easily determine your operating system here.)