February 13, 2012

MAINE COMPASS: Muskie's fall in '72 showed there's no crying in presidential politics

Paul H. Mills

It's an unspoken rule in the presidential playbook: Be firm, show emotion, but don't cry.

Just last month, Newt Gingrich exhibited it with his denunciation of the media in a debate that became the key to his unexpected South Carolina triumph.

Four years ago, Hillary Clinton also showed how it was done. She turned her fortunes around the day before the New Hampshire primary she seemed certain to lose. Ever so close to the brink of crying but short of actual tears, she came forth with her famous, "I just don't want to see us fall backwards," lament.

Often, when in a race for the White House, such emotions evoke a reference to Maine's Edmund Muskie. As Maureen Dowd observed about Clinton in 2008: "Here was Hillary doing the Muskie."

Now, on the 40th anniversary of one of the most pronounced moments in presidential politics, it's a fitting occasion to take a close look at it.

It was February 1972. Since July of 1969, then-Sen. Muskie was the prohibitive frontrunner for the Democratic presidential nomination. As CBS's Eric Severeid, then the dean of network news commentators, said, "Unless this man steps on a land mine he will be nominated."

Gallup polls had shown Muskie as the only Democrat who matched evenly with Republican President Richard Nixon, then seeking re-election.

Crucial to sustaining Muskie's momentum was the early March primary in New Hampshire, where the Maine senator had near favorite-son status. He was expected to win with a two to one margin over all his opponents combined.

Less than two weeks before the primary, the state's largest newspaper, William Loeb's Manchester Union Leader published two pieces that seized the attention of the Muskie campaign.

The first was a front-page editorial headlined, "Senator Muskie Insults Franco-Americans." Loeb accused Muskie of condoning the use of "Canuck," a term sometimes asserted to be a derogatory designation for French Canadians, comprising 40 percent of New Hampshire Democrats.

The editorial was based on a letter purportedly sent to the Union Leader by a Paul Morrison. In it, "Morrison" wrote that a Muskie aide in Florida had said, "We don't have blacks [in Maine], but we have Cannocks" (sic).

To this, Muskie was quoted as laughingly replying, "Come to New England and see."

(Authorship of the letter was never determined conclusively, though it was later by some attributed to Ken Clawson, a White House communications director.)

The next day, Loeb reprinted a brief, 2-month-old Newsweek item about Muskie's wife, Jane. It contained innuendo that Mrs. Muskie had a proclivity for telling dirty jokes, for drinking pre-dinner cocktails and for smoking cigarettes in secret.

The mutual animosity between Muskie and Loeb dated to 1957, after Loeb successfully kept a Peyton Place movie film crew from shooting in New Hampshire. Muskie, then Maine's governor, allowed the somewhat carnally suggestive picture to be filmed in Camden, earning him a fierce denouncement from Loeb.

The "Canuck" and Jane Muskie writeups were the final straw for Muskie. In a campaign where Muskie was sometimes portrayed as lacking "fire" or passion, most of his staff -- including deputy manager George Mitchell -- advised the senator to take on Loeb to show, in Mitchell's words "a fighting Ed Muskie."

The next day, Muskie mounted a flat-bed truck in front of the newspaper's office. He started by refuting the Canuck letter, reserving his greatest ire for the attack on Jane.

Muskie, after calling Loeb a "gutless coward," passionately praised his wife as a "good woman." He then paused for nearly half a minute, heaving his shoulders, rubbing his nose, obviously shaken and unable to speak.

(Continued on page 2)

Were you interviewed for this story? If so, please fill out our accuracy form

Send question/comment to the editors

Further Discussion

Here at KJonline.com we value our readers and are committed to growing our community by encouraging you to add to the discussion. To ensure conscientious dialogue we have implemented a strict no-bullying policy. To participate, you must follow our Terms of Use.

Questions about the article? Add them below and we’ll try to answer them or do a follow-up post as soon as we can. Technical problems? Email them to us with an exact description of the problem. Make sure to include:
  • Type of computer or mobile device your are using
  • Exact operating system and browser you are viewing the site on (TIP: You can easily determine your operating system here.)