Clear

High: 76°

Low: 52°

Sunrise

5:23 AM

Sunset

8:06 PM



March 9

MAINE COMPASS: Pollution-free power sources will help all Maine breathe easier

Mark Ishkanian of Readfield,

Maine has made tremendous progress in ensuring that we breathe smoke-free air whenever we're in an enclosed space in our state.

We are a national leader in protecting people from exposure to secondhand smoke. This protection most recently was expanded to prohibit smoking in cars in which children are occupants.

When we walk into a building in another state that still allows indoor smoking, it is shocking. That's because what was once controversial policy in this state -- assuring smoke-free air in all indoor public spaces -- has now become a public expectation.

Not long ago, secondhand smoke filled Maine's restaurants, office buildings, jury rooms, grocery stores, malls, airports, banks and even the halls of the State House. But when we enter a restaurant today, we no longer hear the question "smoking or nonsmoking?"

This change did not come overnight. It certainly didn't come without conflict. Ten years ago, even the most optimistic public-health advocates would not have thought we would have smoke-free bars, not only in Maine but throughout New England.

Just as Maine fought hard to protect people's health from indoor air pollution over the past 35 years, Maine is now taking thoughtful steps to protect and improve outdoor air quality.

One of our major efforts to improve outdoor air quality is reducing the burning of fossil fuel and expanding the use of clean, healthy and renewable power.

Maine is fortunate to have a wealth of actual and potential renewable power through our hydro, tidal, solar and wind resources.

Through greater reliance on these renewable energy sources, we can reduce dependence on fossil fuels, such as foreign oil and coal, and the toxic pollutants released when they are burned.

According to Dr. Dora Mills, Maine's public health director, decades of study have shown that both foreign oil and coal are major contributors to air pollution and result in avoidable disability and death from heart disease, cancer, asthma and other lung diseases.

Maine has some of the nation's highest rates of asthma and other lung diseases. We also have one of the highest elderly population in the U.S. as a percent of total population. Those with lung disease -- and the elderly in general -- are especially susceptible to the effects of air pollution.

Critics were vocal when Maine debated a ban on indoor smoking. Smokers' rights groups opposed nearly every step forward toward healthier indoor air.

Today, however, smoke-free environments enjoy overwhelming public support.

Now, as Maine works to improve outdoor air quality, critics once have again stepped up efforts to halt progress. Opposition to commercial wind power development is growing.

Claims of impacts on health from wind power must be validated scientifically.

The state needs both regulatory provisions governing wind turbines and careful examination of their siting, especially in proximity to residences, but this needs to be done in a timely manner.

We simply don't have the option of doing nothing to increase renewable energy if we care about breathing clean outdoor air.

Maine uses a lot of energy. We also export energy to markets to our south. We need to ensure that this exported energy, when produced by our clean renewable sources, displaces the fossil fuel sources upwind of Maine so we can benefit from cleaner air coming into our state.

Fossil fuels have dramatically improved our standard of living over the past century.

But we have now reached the point where we must create an energy future that reduces our dependence on foreign oil and coal for the sake of our security, our economy, our environment and, yes, our health.

Maine has taken a leadership role in New England.

On the horizon is the prospect for more wind, solar and tidal energy production, more research and development, and more economic development in our state.

The American Lung Association in Maine has been an early and strong supporter of wind power and other clean renewable energy sources.

The association will continue to support energy solutions that make good economic and health policy sense in order to achieve in outdoor air quality improvements what has already been gained in improved indoor, smoke-free air.

Mark Ishkanian of Readfield, is a member of the boards of the American Lung Association in Maine and New England.

Were you interviewed for this story? If so, please fill out our accuracy form

Send Question/Comment to the Publisher

8 COMMENTS

Gunkholer said...

Alas, the dangers of wind power do NOT have to be proved scientifically. All that has to done is to create a little doubt in the public's mind, and windmills are out the window. Look at the climate change situation. Climate change is scientifically accepted, and is getting more scientifically accepted every day. But those opposed to change have created enough doubt that the acceptance of the existence of climate change has actually FALLEN in the last year. And in a democracy, you can't get anything done without popular support.

March 9, 2010 at 6:04 AM Report abuse

springs said...

Mark Ishkanian's description of the effort to curtail second-hand smoke is great. And he's correct that we need to keep working on making our outdoor air cleaner. One illegal source of air pollution are loud motorcycles that are equipped with open exhaust systems. These systems are designed for off road use only such as racing and are illegal for street use. And yet, more and more loud bikes have drag pipes that have no muffler. This also disables the air pollution equipment which can result in a very large increase in the release of toxins to the point where one loud motorcycle can emit as much per mile of travel as 300 of today's cars. Maine Citizens Against Loud Motorcyles (www.mecalm.org) is working to correct this problem by encouraging enforcement of laws that regulate motorcycles and enacting better laws.

March 9, 2010 at 9:14 AM Report abuse

Blackacre said...

All Ishkanian's comments are likely based on provable facts, but what he has not examined is the cost to Maine businesses - especially the pulp and paper industry. While no one can argue that the mills did not need to clean up their act, most of them have shut down their Maine operations and moved elsewhere. I attribute that result in large part to Maine environmental laws which, though well-intentioned, have had these unforeseen consequences.

March 9, 2010 at 9:24 AM Report abuse

revelation said...

Big oil and the global money players have too much at stake profit wise to let true innovation answer the call of fossil fuels. They have been stonewalling any progress in this area for at least 40 years. There are inventers who have answers to these problems but are either bought out or silenced with the threat of death. I personally know of things that provide reliable energy with zero pollution. They want us dependant on oil so they can make billions off us and don't care what harm it does to the environment.

March 9, 2010 at 12:01 PM Report abuse

lordpeter said...

Ah Ha! Our old friend from CMP is back! How ya doin' bud? Listen up, people - Wind power does not shut down any oil or coal fired plant. None, zip, nada. As of this date, not one coal-fired plant has been shut down, worldwide due to wind coming on line. This is easily verifiable. Actually, all the other forns of energy plants must be kept running to use as backup when the wind does not blow. And they must be kept hot for instant power to the grid

March 10, 2010 at 8:15 PM Report abuse

ThorEau said...

The writer compares today's fight for alternate energy sources like wind to yesterday's fight against second hand cigarette smoke. Funny, but I'd compare the wind industry's denial of wind's health effects today with the tobacco industry's long time denial of cigarette induced lung cancer.

March 10, 2010 at 8:41 PM Report abuse

ThorEau said...

I'm also seeing for the first time, now that we've established the fact that Maine is an electricity exporter, that the reason for Maine wind farms is to cut down on coal emissions upwind from us. Kind of like when the windies were put in the corner on wind having nothing to do with driving, they come up with electric cars. They are running out of moves on the chessboard with such desperation.

March 10, 2010 at 8:43 PM Report abuse

ThorEau said...

Does the American Lund Association care about only the lungs of humans or also the lungs of wildlife. Just curious, because turbine blades are designed to effect great pressure differences and these explode the lungs of bats. Barotrauma. The bats avoi the blades but that doesn't matter. Their lungs are burst from a difference. Remember who eats insects when you get you next mosquito bite.

March 10, 2010 at 9:32 PM Report abuse

Most...