Wednesday, June 19, 2013
By Michael Shepherd mshepherd@mainetoday.com
Staff Writer
AUGUSTA -- One-time fixes, including almost completely raiding the state's reserve fund, represent almost all of the LePage administration's proposed plan to close a $112 million current-year budget gap in the Maine Department of Health and Human Services.

Sawin Millett, the commissioner of administrative and financial services, left, and Department of Health and Human Services Commissioner Mary Mayhew at a state budget news conference on Friday in the Cabinet Room of the State House in Augusta.
Staff photo by Joe Phelan
"We're halfway through the fiscal year and we have the pressure to spend $112 million," said Sawin Millett, commissioner of administration and finance, after a Friday press briefing. "You just can't achieve savings this far into a fiscal year, so you have to come up with these kinds of one-time solutions."
The proposal looks mostly uncontroversial: state Sen. Dawn Hill, D-York, chair of the Maine Legislature's appropriations committee, which will mull the proposal, said her first feeling was relief that most of the savings didn't come at the expense of programs, though there were small cuts.
"I think this will build a lot of positive work for the committee and I think we'll come to a consensus on this relatively quickly," Hill said.
The administration said the DHHS shortfall for the budget year ending in June was driven mainly by the need for $87 million in supplemental funding in MaineCare, Maine's Medicaid program. That included $54 million in over-budget expenses, along with not being able to implement certain Medicaid changes the last Republican-led Legislature approved, but the federal government rejected.
Millett said the largest single component of the proposal to solve the gap will leverage $40 million of $44.5 million in state's Budget Stabilization Fund, or the rainy day fund.
"That's why you have the stabilization fund," said Rep. Kathleen Chase, R-Wells, the ranking Republican on the Legislature's Appropriations Committee. "When we move forward, we'll be putting back money into the stabilization fund."
Millett said $18.5 million will come from a two-week deferral of General Purpose Aid to Maine schools, pushing it into the next budget year, where it would be paid as part of the next biennial budget. He said $17.1 million will come by raiding "rarely used" state working capital funds. Revenue from the Oxford casino was also leveraged, Millett said.
There was some proposed additional spending for 2013, the administration said. It included $4.2 million to address an increase of children in Maine's foster care system and $2 million in mental health funding for some not eligible for MaineCare.
The proposal did contain small program eliminations, payment reductions and adjustments -- totaling less than $4 million of the total package for 2013. Apart from that, general assistance to municipalities was also proposed to be capped at just above $10 million, which the administration wants to continue in LePage's proposed budget for the 2014-15 fiscal years, also released Friday.
The biggest proposed cut in the 2013 proposal -- elimination of the totally state-funded Drugs for the Elderly Program -- will save $1.75 million. But elimination of the program also continues into LePage's proposal for the 2014 and 2015 fiscal years, saving $14 million over that period.
Hill said Democrats on the appropriations committee could look to restore that program as budget negotiations ensue.
"I just don't feel that's a place we can go," she said. "These elderly people, they don't have options for more income. They don't have the option to go out and get jobs."
There would also be a $1.2 million reduction for hospital outpatient services, a 10 percent cut. More than $600,000 would be cut by reducing reimbursement rates to rural critical access hospitals, which the administration would also like to continue into the next biennial budget.
(Continued on page 2)
Tweet
Further Discussion
Here at KJonline.com we value our readers and are committed to growing our community by encouraging you to add to the discussion. To ensure conscientious dialogue we have implemented a strict no-bullying policy. To participate, you must follow our Terms of Use.Questions about the article? Add them below and we’ll try to answer them or do a follow-up post as soon as we can. Technical problems? Email them to us with an exact description of the problem. Make sure to include: