February 27, 2013

Some legislators seek to loosen sign regulations on Maine's roads

Maine DOT looking to postpone bills

By Michael Shepherd mshepherd@centralmaine.com
Staff Writer

AUGUSTA -- Maine's pioneering law banning highway billboards has withstood the test of time since it was enacted in 1977, but the spirit of highway beautification is under siege at the State House.

Lawmakers are lining up to promote nine bills that would grant variances to state sign regulations for individual businesses and attractions.

"Everybody wants a sign," Senate Minority Leader Michael Thibodeau, R-Winterport, said Wednesday in testimony in favor of a bill that would help a snowmobile club in his town keep a sign.

However, managers of Maine roads and a major environmental group say all this has legislators on a slippery slope. Maine has strong laws restricting sign use, but piecemeal requests, if granted, would whittle sign laws down, they say.

So far, the Maine Department of Transportation has requested all such bills be postponed, and the Legislature's Transportation Committee already has tabled three such bills this session.

Three more are set to be heard, and the committee has set up a subcommittee to tackle signage issues as a whole.

It heard three others Wednesday morning -- proposals to exempt snowmobile clubs from certain MaineDOT sign regulations and to put up new signs for a historical site in Brewer and the Oxford Casino.

"Each is of value on its own, in isolation; but I urge you to think about the cumulative impact of these various requests," said Peter Didisheim, advocacy director for the Natural Resources Council of Maine, which opposes all nine bills. "There's a balance that needs to be struck, and I think existing guidelines that allow signage to be placed in the state of Maine for important reasons is a good balance."

The legislative requests aren't partisan, and all are rooted in supposed local merits.

In testimony, Rep. Roger Jackson, R-Oxford, cited the casino's "incredible economic boost" to his region as the reason why he's asking for signs directing traffic to the casino near Gray and Auburn exits on the Maine Turnpike.

Rep. Joseph Brooks of Winterport, an unenrolled liberal, spoke in favor of the snowmobilers' request, which Brooks said started when the DOT asked a snowmobile club in his town to remove a sign from a state route because its presence there is illegal. Thibodeau also spoke in favor of the bill.

And Rep. Richard Campbell, R-Orrington, is proposing that the DOT erect signs in Brewer and on Interstate 95 and Interstate 395, a five-mile connector from Bangor to Brewer, pointing drivers to the Chamberlain Freedom Park in Brewer, a historic site honoring Maine's Civil War-era history and its participation in the Underground Railroad, a network of safehouses used by 19th-century black slaves escaping to freedom.

"This site is a memorial in recognition of Brewer's legacy as a birthplace of leaders of important institutions and causes," said Rep. Arthur Verow, D-Brewer, speaking in favor of the bill. "That's why I believe this site is worthy of a sign to help visitors experience this place of important historical significance."

However, in testimony on two bills Tuesday, DOT legislative liaison Nina Fisher said the snowmobile club bill could lead to other nonprofit groups requesting similar exemptions. The Brewer signs, she said, would be in nonconformance with federal standards.

"Without a clear policy, there is no way to say no to other signs once you say yes to another," Fisher said. "Signs could eventually become meaningless as they get lost in sign noise."

Dan Morin, a spokesman for the Maine Turnpike Authority, told the committee the turnpike -- the stretch of Interstate 95 from Kittery to Augusta -- already has 49 signs that are out of step with federal standards, including 19 that were legislatively mandated. The casino sign also wouldn't meet guidelines.

(Continued on page 2)

Were you interviewed for this story? If so, please fill out our accuracy form

Send question/comment to the editors

Further Discussion

Here at KJonline.com we value our readers and are committed to growing our community by encouraging you to add to the discussion. To ensure conscientious dialogue we have implemented a strict no-bullying policy. To participate, you must follow our Terms of Use.

Questions about the article? Add them below and we’ll try to answer them or do a follow-up post as soon as we can. Technical problems? Email them to us with an exact description of the problem. Make sure to include:
  • Type of computer or mobile device your are using
  • Exact operating system and browser you are viewing the site on (TIP: You can easily determine your operating system here.)