July 22, 2011

Officials seek to calm waters after departure

By Rebekah Metzler
MaineToday Media State House Writer

AUGUSTA --The abrupt resignation of Norman Olsen as commissioner of the Department of Marine Resources on Wednesday left the LePage administration scrambling to mend fences on two fronts Thursday.

click image to enlarge


AP photo

State officials, particularly the department's new acting commissioner, worked to reassure Portland officials and members of the lobster industry of their commitment to both groups in light of scathing remarks by Olsen.

Olsen said Wednesday that he left in part because of a campaign against him by "special interests," which apparently were members of the lobster industry who opposed some of the policy goals that he was pursuing and objected to his demeanor.

And in a written statement issued after his resignation, Olsen said Gov. Paul LePage had said he would no longer seek to collaborate with the city of Portland to bring groundfishing boats back to Maine.

"Portland was against him, (LePage) said, and we will not work with that city," Olsen wrote. "Rather than work with Portland, (LePage) said, we'll build a new port elsewhere."

The publication of Olsen's statement prompted Portland Mayor Nicholas Mavodones to issue a letter to LePage on Thursday requesting a meeting to discuss Olsen's accusation.

"I trust you understand that regardless of the veracity of these statements, the public and the city of Portland need to be reassured that economic development in all Maine communities, both large and small, are a priority for the governor's office," Mavodones wrote.

Pat Keliher, who was named acting commissioner of the Department of Marine Resources on Wednesday, had to step away from a meeting of the Lobster Advisory Council on Thursday to take a call from Mavodones and reassure him of the state's commitment to work with Portland to re-establish a Maine-based groundfishing industry.

A meeting between LePage, Mavodones and Keliher will be scheduled in the near future, according to a release from the governor's office.

A LePage spokesman dismissed Olsen's comments.

"It doesn't make any sense; Portland is a hub for the fishery and we want to make sure that it is as competitive with other places as possible," said Adam Fisher.

Many boats still operate out of Maine and in the state's coastal waters but land their catch in Massachusetts. Landing in Massachusetts offers incentives including free berthing, free ice, cheaper diesel fuel and an opportunity to sell lobsters caught by dragging equipment.

Maine lawmakers did move in this session to eliminate the state tax on diesel fuel for commercial fishermen, in an attempt to make Maine a more viable option. But sales of by-catch lobsters are not allowed in Maine. Olsen's frequent discussion of changing that policy was ill-received by Maine lobstermen.

"We are the most lucrative of all the marine industries. We are number one," said Mike Dassett, a lobsterman who is secretary and treasurer of the Downeast Lobsterman's Association. "And to say because they allow the landing of dragged lobsters somewhere else we should do it too, well, it doesn't make sense."

Dassett said he was "tickled pink" when he heard that Olsen had resigned.

Dassett, like many lobstermen, was alarmed by Olsen's statements at the Fisherman's Forum in March that he supported allowing by-catch lobsters to be landed in Maine, as well as possible changes to tag and license transfers.

Soon after the forum, a petition was circulated among members of the industry to express to the governor their disappointment with his commissioner. More than 100 people signed onto or sent their own copies of the petition to the governor's office, which made the documents available on Thursday.

But the problem was more than just the policy differences, said Dassett.

"It was his way or no way, and he was very blunt, very arrogant," he said of Olsen.

(Continued on page 2)

Were you interviewed for this story? If so, please fill out our accuracy form

Send question/comment to the editors

Further Discussion

Here at we value our readers and are committed to growing our community by encouraging you to add to the discussion. To ensure conscientious dialogue we have implemented a strict no-bullying policy. To participate, you must follow our Terms of Use.

Questions about the article? Add them below and we’ll try to answer them or do a follow-up post as soon as we can. Technical problems? Email them to us with an exact description of the problem. Make sure to include:
  • Type of computer or mobile device your are using
  • Exact operating system and browser you are viewing the site on (TIP: You can easily determine your operating system here.)