RACE TO THE TOP
By Matthew Stone mstone@centralmaine.com
Staff Writer
Eighteen states and Washington, D.C., will continue their bids this summer for billions in federal money aimed at cultivating education reforms.
Follow Matthew Stone's education coverage online in the Report Card blog at www.kjonline.com/blogs/stone.
Maine won't be among them.
The U.S. Department of Education named 19 finalists Tuesday in the second round of Race to the Top, an education reform competition among the states for a share of $4.35 billion in federal money.
Some $3.4 billion of the fund now remains, after Delaware won $100 million and Tennessee $500 million in the first round of awards. Another $350 million is earmarked for multistate partnerships to reform standardized testing.
While New England neighbors Massachusetts and Rhode Island saw their hopes buoyed by making Tuesday's cut, Maine's application for up to $75 million fell short in Department of Education scoring.
Maine was among 36 applicants in Race to the Top's second round. Those with scores of at least 400 on a 500-point scale were named finalists.
The U.S. Department of Education has posted all the state applications on its website, www.ed.gov, and said it would post individual scores online after the competition wraps up in September.
Maine's Race to the Top application focused largely on scaling up existing educational initiatives rather than introducing a slew of new ones, said David Connerty-Marin, a state education department spokesman.
"We're certainly disappointed that we won't be able to scale those up as quickly as we could have with the influx of those (Race to the Top) funds, but it's not going to stop us from doing our work," he said.
The state's 200-page application proposed what the state Department of Education called a system of "personalized learning" that allows students to pursue high school degrees by mastering course materials at their own pace.
The application said all Maine school districts would be required to develop learning support systems to keep struggling students in all grades on track.
It also included multiple mentions of the state's Learning Technology Initiative and its Jobs for Maine's Graduates program. The application proposed using award money to expand both, though it didn't detail a scope of the expansion.
The technology initiative is the first-in-the-nation program that equips all seventh- and eighth-grade students and a majority of high school students with Apple laptops.
Jobs for Maine's Graduates is a nonprofit with programs in more than 60 public schools that targets students at risk of not finishing high school, offering them tutoring help and equipping them with work-readiness skills.
Race to the Top evaluators awarded points based on states' plans for:
* adopting academic standards that prepare students for college and careers;
* building data systems that keep track of student achievement throughout school, college and into the workplace;
* turning around the lowest-achieving schools; and
* recruiting, evaluating and retaining effective teachers and principals.
The prospect of millions of dollars in federal money spurred a number of states to change education policies in those areas. Some states lifted caps on the number of charter schools they allowed; others began work on evaluation systems that rate teachers' job performance in part on their students' academic progress.
This spring, Maine lawmakers changed two policies:
* They passed a bill allowing the state to sign onto a national set of academic standards known as the Common Core. So far, 27 states have adopted the standards.
* They passed legislation allowing so-called innovative schools in lieu of charter schools. Charter schools aren't allowed in Maine, but are favored by the Obama administration.
* And they struck down a legal barrier -- long favored by Maine's largest teachers' union, the Maine Education Association -- that prevented the use of students' academic performance in teacher evaluations.
At the union's suggestion, the Legislature charged a special task force -- with representatives from the teachers' union and groups representing school boards and administrators -- with pre-approving evaluations that incorporate student academic data.
Federal evaluators also awarded points based on the level of support for Race to the Top proposals by school districts and education unions. In Maine, 82 of more than 200 school districts signed onto parts of the effort. Even fewer local teachers' unions -- 24 -- pledged their support.
Maine Education Association leaders couldn't be reached for comment Tuesday.
Steve Bowen, who directs the Center for Education Excellence at the Maine Heritage Policy Center, said he wasn't surprised Maine's application didn't make the final cut.
"The application was so uneven, it wasn't convincing; it wasn't well written," said Bowen, "I think it's disappointing, but it's anything but a surprise."
In multiple spots, the application is ridden with typographical errors and fragmented sentences. The quality of writing largely obscured what wasn't such a bad reform plan that should have generated more support, Bowen said.
"I think the combination of sort of an uneven application that wasn't strong enough, a pretty spotty record in terms of reform, I think that really hurt us," he said. "We're nowhere in the ballpark, but at least you can put something in that's carefully written."
Connerty-Marin said, "Any document can be improved upon, but I think we made our case."
The Obama administration has requested $1.35 billion for a third round of Race to the Top, and a U.S. House panel recently approved $800 million for it.
Connerty-Marin said it's too early to say whether Maine would participate again.
Matthew Stone -- 623-3811, ext. 435
mstone@centralmaine.com
Were you interviewed for this story? If so, please fill out our accuracy form
13 COMMENTS
dG90YWxzbGFt said...
It's good not to have the federal governments strings running this state like a puppet. Lets renew our senators shall we.
July 28, 2010 at 3:25 AM Report abuse
Student04330 said...
who filled or did not fill out the application
July 28, 2010 at 6:10 AM Report abuse
Govt2Big said...
This is yet another failure for the lame Baldacci Administration but our kids will be the ones who really suffer from this missed opportunity. Don’t forget, the MEA leaders are also partially responsible for this failure.
July 28, 2010 at 6:37 AM Report abuse
MeMissU said...
Second chances don't come around that often, if ever. I think it's outrageous that an application that is so critical and important was presented with fragmented sentences, typo's, and lack of clarity. What results can educators expect from something they deem to be so meaningless? A 200 page report is not that big a deal with so much money to be had for such a great cause, and there's always "spellcheck" and English teachers who could've/should've checked every word. The lack or care, concern, and respect reflected in the presentation is a clear example of why Maine needs help in providing better education, and it also indicates the nonchelant approach it has towards that end. Maine may very well be "Where America's Day Begins" but it just may be where it ends, in terms of education. As a succeessful dedicated homeschooler, I'm outraged that so many are left behind. The keyword here is: dedication. Dedication and commitment to excellence! Go For It!!!!!
July 28, 2010 at 7:00 AM Report abuse
Divinity said...
"The application was so uneven, it wasn't convincing; it wasn't well written," said Bowen, "I think it's disappointing, but it's anything but a surprise." In multiple spots, the application is ridden with typographical errors and fragmented sentences. The quality of writing largely obscured what wasn't such a bad reform plan that should have generated more support, Bowen (of the MHPC) said. ______________________________________________________________________________ Perhaps our next Governor can provide a model of proper grammar, spelling, and style for communications produced by state agencies. The Maine Heritage Policy Council does us a service by pointing out the importance of well-written communications. Catchy titles such as "The Piglet Book" are insufficient compensation for poor writing, flights from fact, and unsupported conclusions.
July 28, 2010 at 7:37 AM Report abuse
SheReads said...
We don't need the Federal government micro-managing our State educational system and should not be jumping for the almighty carrot anyway.
July 28, 2010 at 7:42 AM Report abuse
mainecomrade said...
This is good news! The last thing we need is more Federal Gov't assistance. The more money we get from them, the more strings that are attached.
July 28, 2010 at 7:52 AM Report abuse
undefined said...
As every home-schooler knows, chelants or chelating agents are chemicals that form soluble, complex molecules with certain metal ions, inactivating the ions so that they cannot normally react with other elements or ions to produce precipitates. Nonchelants are coordination complexes with monodentate ligands, which form only one bond with the central atom as contrasted with the formation or presence of two or more separate bindings between a polydentate (multiple bonded) ligand and a single central atom. Why MeMissU states that a failure to "spellcheck" represents "a clear example of why Maine needs help in providing better education, and it also indicates the nonchelant approach it has" may relate to her appreciation of the derivation of the word chelation - it is derived from Greek χηλή, chelè, meaning claw; the ligands lie around the central atom like the claws of a lobster. Or perhaps she is thinking of our Congresswoman from the First District.
July 28, 2010 at 7:56 AM Report abuse
hallowellboy said...
"Maine doesn't need or want the money". Are you serious? Vote Collins and Snowe again to ensure you won't get it.
July 28, 2010 at 8:00 AM Report abuse
Scholar said...
Worse than losing out on the RFTT grant, the Maine Dept. of Education bureaucracy continues to spend millions on their "educational inititiatives" while passing along more millions in funding cuts to local schools. You know those local schools don't you? They're the ones wherein our children actually receive their educations!
July 28, 2010 at 9:40 AM Report abuse
Robinwhod said...
Isn't this free money?
July 28, 2010 at 9:44 AM Report abuse
goodone said...
Race for the top funds is nothing more than extortion on a federal level. This is federal tax money collected from the entire country, but it will only go to those states that comply with the federal education rules. If every tax payer has contributed to this fund then it should be given out on a per-capita basis. Holding money from states just because they won't conform equals extortion.
July 28, 2010 at 5:17 PM Report abuse
MECommenter said...
We'll be competitive for these grants when our education policies are no longer under the thumb of the teachers' union. The union supports mediocrity and enables poor teachers and institutions. Terrible.
July 28, 2010 at 7:50 PM Report abuse