BY MATTHEW STONE, Staff Writer
AUGUSTA -- Three bills meant to bolster Maine's position in a federal competition for $4 billion in education reform dollars drew tepid support, and plenty of skepticism, from education lobbyists and reform advocates at a public hearing Thursday.
The bills would:
* strike down a provision in Maine law that bars tying student achievement data to teacher and principal evaluations, opening the door to performance-based pay for teachers;
* allow Maine to adopt a set of national curriculum standards, the "Common Core Standards," being developed by the National Governors Association; and
* let school districts set up so-called "innovative" schools that have more freedom than traditional public schools in choosing staff members and developing curriculum.
Gov. John Baldacci's administration developed the proposals in an effort to improve Maine's position in the Race to the Top, a competition sponsored by the U.S. Department of Education that rewards states embracing school reforms endorsed by the Obama administration. The $4 billion fund was part of the federal economic stimulus package.
At Thursday's hearing, representatives of the state's principals, superintendents and largest teachers' union cautioned lawmakers against swiftly changing state education policy simply to conform with competition guidelines.
"We resent the national pressure being applied by the federal government to change state laws as a prerequisite to applying for Race to the Top funds," Richard Durost, executive director of the Maine Principals' Association, told members of the Legislature's Education Committee. "If the result was guaranteed funding, we might be more agreeable. In its present form, this is nothing more than federal blackmail."
Others suggested the three proposals didn't go far enough toward bringing Maine in line with the education reforms embraced by the Obama administration.
In recent months, a number of states -- including Massachusetts, Michigan and Tennessee -- have loosened limits on independently run charter schools, made it easier for school administrators to fire ineffective teachers and introduced alternative ways for teachers to earn their certifications as they've prepared their Race to the Top applications.
"All of their efforts are more extensive, more ambitious and far more likely to have a transformational effect on students and schools than what you have before you today," said Stephen Bowen, director of the Center for Education Excellence at the Maine Heritage Policy Center, a conservative think tank.
The Baldacci administration is pushing the "innovative" schools proposal -- rather than a proposal for independently run charter schools -- after repeated attempts at legalizing charter schools in Maine have failed.
While support wasn't strong for the bills at Thursday's hearing, only one of the proposals attracted any opposition.
The Maine Education Association, the teachers' union, voiced its opposition to striking down the prohibition on using student achievement data as a factor in teacher and principal evaluations.
"There is little or no evidence that tying student test scores to teacher evaluations is an accurate or useful way to measure teacher effectiveness," Chris Galgay, the union's president, said.
Others, who said they supported ending the prohibition, raised concerns about developing fair and accurate evaluation systems for teachers and principals.
The hearing came on the same day that the U.S. Department of Education announced that 15 states and Washington, D.C., made the first cut as finalists in an early round of the Race to the Top competition.
Maine is planning to apply by June 1 for funds in the second round of the contest, and could be eligible for up to $100 million, Maine Education Commissioner Susan Gendron said.
Matthew Stone -- 623-3811, ext. 435
mstone@centralmaine.com
Were you interviewed for this story? If so, please fill out our accuracy form
5 COMMENTS
jack33 said...
Federal funding is often tied to certain requirements - this is not new. What's new may be, however, various state objections to certain requirements. States don't have to take the money... but I don't imagine the feds in Washington backing down however, not as long as other states are willing to divvy up Maine's unwanted share. But never pretend state's rights supersede government control - the Civil War settled that question.
March 5, 2010 at 6:02 AM Report abuse
CaptBucky said...
Of course "educators are lukewarm" about this. It finally allows teachers to be held to the same standards as employees in other professions. The students performance reflects on the teachers ability to remain employed. The state law on this is a joke crafted by teachers unions. Also the competition provided by alternative schools has been shown to improve public schools as they have to compete for students and funding.
March 5, 2010 at 7:28 AM Report abuse
LizieD said...
I suspect it's going to get a lot harder for bright kids to get into Gifted and Talented programs, since teachers will need to keep them in regular classroom placements to inflate the average scores among their students. It will be tempting to classify more disabled kids as qualifying for special ed, since getting them out of the regular classroom would raise the average scores for each teacher's pupils. But that won't happen because it's too expensive to give them the help they need.
March 5, 2010 at 7:38 AM Report abuse
AJ said...
Here's the problem Capt Bucky. Bosses who are held to account for the work their underlings do also usually have the ability to fire underperforming employees. Can teachers who have a handful of disruptive students who ruin it for the majority "fire" those students? Send them to the office, have the office suspend them only to have screaming parents come in an threaten the principal and teacher over the subject? When teachers are allowed to be more than babysitters, I may agree more with your position.
March 5, 2010 at 12:33 PM Report abuse
Chris said...
Mass. is one of 16 finalists in the first round of Obama's "Race top to the Top" federal grants and the Boston Globe reported that could receive up to $70 million per year for four years. However here any changes that might impact the teachers union seem to be “unmentionable” in the legislature, just like reform of state retiree's health care benefits and state pension reform.
March 5, 2010 at 6:09 PM Report abuse