THE RACE FOR GOVERNOR

June 11, 2010

Dollars didn't necessarily translate into votes

By Edward D. Murphy emurphy@mainetoday.com
Staff Writer

BY EDWARD D. MURPHY

Portland Press Herald

Marden's is where many Mainers look for serious bargains, so perhaps it's no surprise that Paul LePage, the retailer's general manager, got his votes for cheap in Tuesday's primary.

LePage's campaign spent about $190,000, according to preliminary finance reports, to win the Republican gubernatorial nomination with 48,370 votes. That works out to less than $4 a vote.

By contrast, Les Otten spent nearly $2.5 million seeking the same nomination. He came in second -- and spent more than $110 for each of the 22,569 votes cast for him.

John Morris, chief of staff for LePage's campaign, said spending little wasn't a strategy, but it does reflect the candidate's philosophy.

"We just didn't spend money foolishly," he said. "It reflects the values and the frugality of the candidate. It demonstrates what he will do in Augusta."

Morris credits volunteers for helping to keep the campaign's costs down. LePage apparently captured a lot of energetic support from conservative Tea Party backers.

"How do you put a dollar value on an enthusiastic volunteer who works for you 20 hours a week?" Morris said.

At the other end of spectrum, Otten said he had to spend a lot of money on his campaign, which worked out to $110.65 a vote.

Otten said much of his advertising, particularly late in the campaign, answered ads criticizing his management of American Skiing Co., the string of ski resorts that he built about a decade ago. The company ran into financial difficulties and ended up selling off all of the resorts.

Otten said ads by his opponent Bruce Poliquin inaccurately suggested that the company went bankrupt and the resorts cut hundreds of jobs.

"It is much more expensive to run a positive campaign than it is to run a negative one," Otten said. "It cost money to respond to that and I was willing to do that. We spent a considerable amount of money defending ourselves."

Dennis Bailey, a consultant to Rosa Scarcelli's campaign for the Democratic nomination, said the amount spent -- he said TV ads usually account for about 80 cents of each dollar spent -- shows just how expensive it is to run for office, even in Maine, where costs are generally lower than elsewhere.

He said most of the effort to reform campaign spending focuses on limiting contributions, but, "We really ought to be finding a way to reduce expenses. ... Contributions don't change the cost. It just means you spend more time raising money."

He said Scarcelli spent the most -- overall and per-vote -- among the four Democrats because she has been a business executive, not a politician. "Rosa was a total unknown and she needed the money to get her name out there," he said.

Scarcelli and Otten provided much of the money for their own campaigns. Otten loaned his campaign most of its money and Scarcelli pumped much of her own money into her campaign, contributing nearly $250,000 in the last two weeks alone.

Bailey said LePage's win in the Republican primary was probably the most interesting because he spent so little compared with the other candidates.

"He's really caught a wave," Bailey said. "He's a special case. There are plenty of people in Otten's position, who spend a lot and lose, but there aren't many in LePage's case, who spend so little and win."

Douglas Hodgkin, a professor emeritus of political science at Bates College, said money can sometimes backfire in politics.

"Spending is not the be-all and end-all of campaigning," he said. "It's possible some voters could have been turned off by what they believed was excessive spending, thinking the candidate may have been attempting to buy the office."

Conversely, some people may have liked the fact that LePage spent little, enhancing his image as a self-made person who isn't interested in slick packaging, Hodgkin said.

But his support from the Tea Party movement may have been the key, bringing out people who were willing to knock on doors for the campaign and talk up LePage with their families and neighbors, Hodgkin said.

"Enthusiastic volunteers can go a long way, as we saw in this race," he said.

Hodgkin said it appeared that many of Tuesday's voters turned out specifically to vote for LePage, and they were largely immune to advertising by other campaigns, no matter how much was spent.

Hodgkin said he worked at the polls on Tuesday and found that many unenrolled voters asked to register with the parties so they could vote in the primaries. He sent those voters to a table where they could change from independent voters.

When they returned to his table to pick up ballots, most had registered as Republicans.

 

Were you interviewed for this story? If so, please fill out our accuracy form

Send Question/Comment to the Publisher




Further Discussion

Here at PressHerald.com we value our readers and are committed to growing our community by encouraging you to add to the discussion. To ensure conscientious dialogue we have implemented a strict no-bullying policy. To participate, you must follow our Terms of Use.

Questions about the article? Add them below and we’ll try to answer them or do a follow-up post as soon as we can. Technical problems? Email them to us with an exact description of the problem. Make sure to include:
  • Type of computer or mobile device your are using
  • Exact operating system and browser you are viewing the site on (TIP: You can easily determine your operating system here.)


Most...