Overcast

High: 65°

Low: 45°

Sunrise

6:12 AM

Sunset

6:58 PM


Find a car, truck suvSearch Maine Real Estate

STATE HOUSE

February 24

Bill to stimulate, not mandate, energy savings

BY ETHAN WILENSKY-LANFORD, Staff Writer

A bill some believe could spark a new industry based on creating efficiencies in the state's electricity market has garnered the unanimous support of the Legislature's Utilities and Energy Committee.

L.D. 1647 would require the Public Utilities Commission, which regulates the state's electricity market, to request contracts for efficiency projects in the same vein it now requests and handles contracts for energy production.

"The wonderful thing about efficiency is that it is cheaper than supply, it is cleaner than supply, and it also creates jobs that cannot be exported," said House Majority Whip Seth Berry, D-Bowdoinham, who sponsored the bill.

The 2009 annual report from Efficiency Maine -- the state agency for for efficiency programs that will be spun off from the PUC this summer -- said it costs 4.1 cents to save a kilowatt-hour of electricity. The electricity cost for most customers in the state is at least 9 cents per kwh.

If the bill is implemented, Berry said a percentage of ratepayers' electricity bills would be channeled to the Efficiency Maine Trust, which would implement programs to encourage homeowners and businesses to use less energy.

Berry said 15 percent of a homeowners electricity bill might go to the trust, which then, for example, could help provide new energy-efficient dryers to people with old inefficient models.

Businesses would be able to save even more electricity than homeowners, Berry said, by retrofitting wasteful energy hogs such as old lighting systems with new, more efficient fluorescent lamps. Any industrial system that uses a motor or compressor also could be upgraded.

"Drives and compressors in manufacturing processes often have two speeds -- on or off," Berry said. "If you install today's technologies, which essentially ramp them up slowly, and only apply the energy when it's needed, there are tremendous savings that result."

The bill would allow large industries to contract directly with Efficiency Maine or contractors to act as middlemen to "harvest megawatts" from the grid.

Industrial energy consumers worked with Berry to craft an amendment to allow the PUC to buy renewable energy certificates, or RECs , which are issued when a power generator produces energy by renewable means, such as burning wood chips.

Statute requires a growing percentage of Maine's and other state's energy output to be renewable; this gives these certificates a market value. With this bill, the PUC could allow ratepayers to essentially invest in renewable energy through this mechanism.

Central Maine Power Company had opposed the bill but its spokesman, John Carroll, said the company supported it after the committee made several changes.

"We actually think that the process has been constructive, and we're satisfied that the committee has been able to satisfy many of our concerns with the bill," Carroll said.

One change Carroll said he liked -- made Thursday, shortly before the committee voted to support the bill -- gives the PUC discretion, instead of a mandate, on whether to enter into efficiency contracts.

"It makes it a lot better bill," said Rep. Ken Fletcher, R-Winslow. "We can't just put this thing on automatic pilot. We think that this is such a critical area that we need to let the PUC, through their deliberations, exercise their discretion."

The PUC already has the power to require utilities to enter into these types of contracts, and has made efficiency a "top priority" for bid acceptance, PUC spokeswoman Evelyn deFrees said. It has not, however, entered into any contracts requiring utilities to provide efficiencies to ratepayers, so far.

Ethan Wilensky-Lanford -- 620-7016

ewlanford@mainetoday.com

Were you interviewed for this story? If so, please fill out our accuracy form

Send Question/Comment to the Publisher

9 COMMENTS

AKMaineiac said...

Let me make sure I get this straight, so I am not confused. I pay 15% more on my power bill than I need to. The 15% goes into a slush fund for people to buy a newer more efficient dryer? Why don't they go buy their dryer with their own money? I had to buy mine with my own money. What the heck is it with the welfare crap anyway? How come it's got to be someone else paying for something for someone else? And always at the point of a gun too... It's not "mandatory"... nope, and neither were seat belts, smoke and carbon monoxide detectors, and a whole host of other things now "required by law". Won't be long now... won't be long.

February 24, 2010 at 1:34 AM Report abuse

Gunkholer said...

The article says that 15 percent of the utility bill will be siphoned off to go to this efficiency fund. Now, is that 15 percent of the current bill -- in which case CMP gets paid 15% less -- or is this another 15% added on top of the current bill?

February 24, 2010 at 6:14 AM Report abuse

lessgov said...

I smell another abuse of taxpayers money.

February 24, 2010 at 6:42 AM Report abuse

CommomSense said...

When is CMP going to ask for a rate hike to cover the 15% loss?

February 24, 2010 at 6:46 AM Report abuse

GoTigers said...

So, here we are in the worst economic times since the Carter administration, and these people spend our money coming up with things like this? Do we believe that there will be no mandates by the PUC once they have the power to do so? Do we believe that this will not cost consumers and taxpayers more money in the end? What about people who have already spent their money to make their homes efficient? Do you think we like having to pay an extra 15% to pay for people who couldn't be bothered? GENIUS. Way to go. Maine used to be a place to be proud of.

February 24, 2010 at 7:21 AM Report abuse

Robinwhod said...

This bill will reduce Maine's dependence on foreign energy and will reduce energy costs for Maine rate payers... True or False

February 24, 2010 at 9:02 AM Report abuse

wollydevil said...

False CMP will run to PUC for rate hike an will get it.

February 24, 2010 at 9:12 AM Report abuse

goodone said...

This liberal led state knows it is taboo to raise taxes, so they have become very creative at getting funding for this kind of liberal policy. This 15% will be passed on to consumers in addition to the federal carbon credit program, the liberals in washington are attempting to pass. The only siphoning this will create, will be from your bank account! Seth, you need to stop this tax hike now, before it gets started!

February 24, 2010 at 9:32 AM Report abuse

logicalview said...

Does Rep. Berry understand how much his proposed 15 percent energy efficiency 'tax' will cost the people of Maine? This would seem to be the typical Democrate mindset that we will tax you to give you back some of what we took from you and employ a few more state government bureaucratics in the process. But the real question is...why do the people of Rep. Berry's district keep electing him so that he can take more money out of their pockets?

February 25, 2010 at 9:23 PM Report abuse

Most...