February 18, 2013

White House denies leaking draft immigration bill

Aides say the president is pleased with the progress of congressional talks and isn't trying to nudge the process along.

By BRIAN BENNETT and KATHLEEN HENNESSEY/Tribune Washington Bureau

WASHINGTON — The White House tried Sunday to keep congressional negotiations over immigration law on track, reassuring senators that the administration did not leak details of a draft bill being written by the administration.

DRAFT BILL ECHOES
EARLIER REFORM EFFORTS

Details of the draft bill, which includes an eight-year waiting period before legalized immigrants can receive a green card, were first published late Saturday by USA Today. The White House did not confirm whether the reported details represented the current version of the draft.

Speaking on the condition of anonymity while discussing internal deliberations, an official who has read the draft cited the following provisions

The bill would allow the 11 million illegal immigrants in the United States to apply for a "lawful prospective immigrant" visa, and if approved, ultimately become permanent residents.

The bill also would increase customs officers at ports of entry, and expand other border security measures.

The bill would also require employers to develop a system to check the immigration status of new hires within five years.

It calls for hiring 140 new immigration judges to speed up cases and requires the Social Security Administration to redesign Social Security cards to make them harder to forge, said the official.

Those proposals track closely with legislation that failed in Congress in the past, as well as reforms Obama previously proposed. In 2011, Obama proposed setting an eight-year waiting period for an illegal immigrant to become a legal permanent resident, and an additional  five-year delay to attain citizenship.

– Tribune Washington Bureau

White House aides said they were caught by surprise when details from a draft of an administration bill were published Saturday, and quickly contacted the eight Republican and Democratic senators who have been working behind the scenes on a compromise bill.

Obama's aides said in the phone calls that the president is pleased with the progress in Congress and said the administration had not leaked the details to nudge the process along, according to a White House official who spoke on the condition of anonymity because the conversations were private.

Obama said last month he would propose his own legislation only if the Senate drive stalled.

The furious Republican response to the disclosure – Sen. Marco Rubio of Florida called the draft bill "half-baked and seriously flawed," and former vice-presidential candidate Rep. Paul Ryan of Wisconsin called the leak "counterproductive" – highlighted how fraught the negotiations have become.

"This raises the question: Does the president really want a result, or does he want another cudgel to beat up Republicans so that he can get political advantage in the next election?" Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., said on NBC's "Meet the Press."

McCain is one of four Republicans, including Rubio, who with four Democrats who are trying to write a new immigration law.

Sen. Charles E. Schumer, D-N.Y., another member of the group, said he was not upset at the leaked draft legislation.

Obama "agreed to give us the space we need to come up with a bipartisan proposal," Schumer said on CNN's "State of the Union." "I am very hopeful that in March we will have a bipartisan bill."

Denis McDonough, the newly appointed White House chief of staff, used previously scheduled appearances on several TV talk shows to contain the political damage. He reiterated that the White House would only try to push its own bill if the efforts in Congress failed to move quickly.

"Let's make sure that it doesn't have to be proposed," McDonough said on ABC News' "This Week."

Were you interviewed for this story? If so, please fill out our accuracy form

Send question/comment to the editors




Further Discussion

Here at KJonline.com we value our readers and are committed to growing our community by encouraging you to add to the discussion. To ensure conscientious dialogue we have implemented a strict no-bullying policy. To participate, you must follow our Terms of Use.

Questions about the article? Add them below and we’ll try to answer them or do a follow-up post as soon as we can. Technical problems? Email them to us with an exact description of the problem. Make sure to include:
  • Type of computer or mobile device your are using
  • Exact operating system and browser you are viewing the site on (TIP: You can easily determine your operating system here.)