Tuesday, May 21, 2013
By Kevin Miller kmiller@mainetoday.com
Washington Bureau Chief
WASHINGTON – A Senate committee on Thursday postponed its vote on a federal judicial candidate from Maine whose nomination has been pending for more than a year.
William Kayatta, a partner at the Pierce Atwood law firm in Portland, was one of three federal judicial nominees slated for consideration by the Senate Judiciary Committee on Thursday. But Republican committee members requested a one-week delay on all three.
President Barack Obama first nominated Kayatta for the 1st Circuit Court of Appeals in Boston on Jan. 23, 2012. The Judiciary Committee endorsed the Cape Elizabeth resident three months later, sending his name to the full Senate for consideration.
But Kayatta and several dozen other judicial nominees fell victim to election-year politics. Employing a tactic used by both parties over the years, Republicans blocked consideration of the nominees prior to the election in hopes that a Republican win in the presidential race would allow the victor to make their own appointments.
With six full-time judges, the 1st Circuit is the smallest circuit court one step below the U.S. Supreme Court and is the last resort for most appeals from Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Puerto Rico and Rhode Island.
Kayatta would replace Judge Kermit Lipez, also of Maine.
Carl Tobias, a professor at the University of Richmond School of Law who tracks judicial nominations, said he expects Kayatta to be easily approved by the committee next Thursday. The question, Tobias added, is when he and the other judicial nominees will be brought up on the Senate floor.
“There is nothing controversial” about Kayatta, Tobias said. “He is well-qualified and he has strong home-state support.”
Portland lawyer William Kayatta has been nominated by President Obama to fill a seat on the 1st Circuit Court of Appeals.
2002 Staff File Photo
Further Discussion
Here at KJonline.com we value our readers and are committed to growing our community by encouraging you to add to the discussion. To ensure conscientious dialogue we have implemented a strict no-bullying policy. To participate, you must follow our Terms of Use.Questions about the article? Add them below and we’ll try to answer them or do a follow-up post as soon as we can. Technical problems? Email them to us with an exact description of the problem. Make sure to include: