February 24, 2013

Maine faces $5 million in federal education cuts under sequester threat

Automatic federal budget cuts next week would also trim millions for environmental programs, defense programs and services for the elderly

By Kevin Miller kmiller@pressherald.com
Staff Writer

WASHINGTON — Maine stands to lose more than $5 million in education funding as well as millions more for environmental programs, defense programs and services for the elderly under federal budget cuts set to start this week, according to the White House.

In another attempt to ratchet up public pressure on Congress, the White House on Sunday released state-by-state estimates of how defense and domestic programs would be affected under the $85 billion “sequester” cuts that begin Friday. 

Democratic and Republican leaders still appear far apart on how to avert the across-the-board spending reductions.

In Maine as in most states, the defense industry would be hit hard, because 50 percent of the overall cuts will be levied on the Department of Defense.

The White House estimated that 22 days of unpaid furloughs for roughly 7,000 civilian defense employees in Maine would reduce payroll by $41.7 million.

Although not specifically mentioned in the report, many of those furloughed employees would be from the Portsmouth Naval Shipyard in Kittery, which has roughly 4,700 civilian workers from Maine and New Hampshire. Impacts on Bath Iron Works’ 5,000 employees would be less immediate, however officials there are concerned that budget uncertainty could cause the Navy to delay contracts for new destroyers.

But education programs would also be impacted, as expected. According to the White House, those impacts could include:

• Loss of $2.7 million in primary and secondary education funding, putting at risk 40 teachers and teacher’s aides while cutting services to 2,000 students and 20 schools.

• $2.6 million less for 30 teachers and staff who work with for children with disabilities.

• Elimination of funding for about 300 Head Start students.

• More than 100 lower-income college students will receive tuition assistance or work-study jobs.

The White House also estimated that 740 fewer children might  not receive vaccinations due to the loss of $51,000 in federal funding while programs that provide meals to seniors would lose $197,000. Other health care programs for substance abuse and HIV testing would lose nearly $400,000 while environmental protection and wildlife programs would lose $1.9 million.

“This is going to have very real impacts on people’s lives and communities,” Dan Pfeiffer, senior advisor to President Obama, said in a conference call with reporters on Sunday. “Are all of these things going into effect on the first day (of March)? No. But there are hundreds of thousands of people working today who will lose their jobs because of sequestration.”

Sunday’s state-by-state reports were the latest attempt by the Obama administration to pressure Republican leaders in Congress into either delaying the cuts or accepting a plan that would mix spending reductions with elimination of tax exemptions for corporations and wealthy individuals. Republicans, in addition to accusing the administration of waging a “fear mongering” campaign, are insisting that the savings come from spending cuts, including from Medicare and other entitlement programs.

New, dire-sounding predictions have come out of the White House almost daily and administration officials suggested Sunday that additional agencies will release new details as the week progresses.

On Friday, the Federal Aviation Administration announced that Bangor International Airport and Manchester-Boston Regional Airport were among 60 facilities nationwide that could lose overnight staffing in their air traffic control towers.

Under such a scenario, coverage would bump to air traffic controllers in the regional center in Boston. However, the changes could affect commercial airlines’ willingness to schedule late-night or early-morning flights into and out of the airports.

Acadia National Park, meanwhile, is preparing plans for a $390,000 cut, the park’s deputy superintendent said Friday. That could mean shortening the season that the visitor center is open, eliminating an air and water quality specialist and fewer interpretive programs for the park, which gets about 2.5 million visitors annually.

(Continued on page 2)

Were you interviewed for this story? If so, please fill out our accuracy form

Send question/comment to the editors




Further Discussion

Here at KJonline.com we value our readers and are committed to growing our community by encouraging you to add to the discussion. To ensure conscientious dialogue we have implemented a strict no-bullying policy. To participate, you must follow our Terms of Use.

Questions about the article? Add them below and we’ll try to answer them or do a follow-up post as soon as we can. Technical problems? Email them to us with an exact description of the problem. Make sure to include:
  • Type of computer or mobile device your are using
  • Exact operating system and browser you are viewing the site on (TIP: You can easily determine your operating system here.)