Bill would prohibit Maine State Employees Association and other public employee labor unions from donating money to campaigns of state lawmakers

February 13, 2013

Union in strong opposition to proposed campaign donations bill

By Susan M. Cover
State House Bureau

AUGUSTA — The Maine State Employees Association voiced strong opposition Wednesday to a bill that would prohibit it and other public employee labor unions from donating money to candidates for statewide office.

Rep. Peter Johnson, R-Greenville, is sponsoring L.D. 110 because he believes it’s a conflict of interest for unions to be able to give money to legislators who then determine their pay and benefits.

“Elected officials have an obligation to protect taxpayers’ interests as well as the welfare of our employees,” he said. “The system of allowing unions to influence the election of officials who will vote on or sponsor legislation designed to favor their members, is a clear conflict of interest.”

But the MSEA, which represents about 10,000 state workers, called the bill unconstitutional and unfair.

“In the arena of self-interest, however, we are no different and no less than other organizations that benefit directly from state policies and budgets,” said Ginette Rivard, president of MSEA. “Hospitals, for profit and nonprofit businesses and health insurance companies are just a few that come to mind.”

Union attorney Timothy Belcher said the bill violates the union’s First Amendment right to contribute to political campaigns and equal protect and due process guaranteed by the 14th Amendment. He called the bill “a regrettable attempt by the sponsors to silence Maine citizens whose voice they find objectionable.”

“A vote for this bill is a vote against freedom of speech and association,” he said.

In addition to the bill sponsor, one other person spoke in favor of the measure. Paul Johnson of Oakland — no relation to bill sponsor Peter Johnson — is a retired state worker who thinks the public would have more confidence in government if these types of perceived conflicts did not exist.

“This would restore public confidence,” he said.

The bill will be considered at a work session set for 1 p.m. Feb. 20. While it may come out of committee with a split vote, it is unlikely to pass the Democratically-controlled House and Senate.

Susan Cover — 621-5643

Were you interviewed for this story? If so, please fill out our accuracy form

Send question/comment to the editors

Further Discussion

Here at we value our readers and are committed to growing our community by encouraging you to add to the discussion. To ensure conscientious dialogue we have implemented a strict no-bullying policy. To participate, you must follow our Terms of Use.

Questions about the article? Add them below and we’ll try to answer them or do a follow-up post as soon as we can. Technical problems? Email them to us with an exact description of the problem. Make sure to include:
  • Type of computer or mobile device your are using
  • Exact operating system and browser you are viewing the site on (TIP: You can easily determine your operating system here.)