June 17, 2013

S. Portland group gets signatures to ban importing oil

The group opposing tar-sands oil gets nearly four times the 950 needed to put the question to voters.

By Matt Byrne mbyrne@pressherald.com
Staff Writer

SOUTH PORTLAND — A citizens group that opposes the prospect of tar-sands oil being pumped through South Portland has collected nearly 4,000 signatures to ask voters whether they want to ban oil importation within city limits.

click image to enlarge

Two-year-old Cadence Kessler of South Portland sits atop her dad Chris Kessler, who stands next to her mother, Jessie Kessler, left, as they join members of the Concerned Citizens of South Portland at a news conference Monday.

John Patriquin / Staff Photographer

click image to enlarge

Members and supporters of Concerned Citizens of South Portland hold a news conference outside South Portland City Hall on Monday.

John Patriquin / Staff Photographer

Additional Photos Below

The 3,779 signatures are nearly four times the 950 needed to put the question before voters on the November ballot. The question would ask whether the city should enact a zoning change to restrict new development of petroleum-related industry on its waterfront.

"It's clear the people of South Portland want this initiative in November," said Carol Masterson, an organizer with the Concerned Citizens of South Portland.

Mayor Tom Blake and his wife, Dee Dee, were the last to add their signatures to the list Monday, in front of a small crowd outside City Hall.

Blake acknowledged that the pipeline's owner, Portland Pipe Line Corp., has provided jobs in the city. But he punctured the notion that employment opportunities could trump the values of environmental safety and long-term energy sustainability.

"No amount of jobs are important (enough) if we can't drink the water, breathe the air or work the soil we stand on," Blake said.

Tar sands oil is heavy crude oil from deep underground sand deposits. The largest deposits, which are flushed from the ground with steam, are in western Canada.

Environmentalists have campaigned to stop its movement, because of fears about spills and concerns that burning the fuels derived from it would drive up carbon emissions and accelerate climate change.

Petroleum industry representatives say that transportation of tar sands oil by pipeline poses no public safety hazard.

The citizens group in South Portland says any pumping of tar-sands oil through the city's port would require construction of two smokestacks near Bug Light Park that would emit an unknown combination of volatile organic compounds and other harmful gases and particles.

In a prepared statement, Portland Pipe Line Chief Executive Officer Larry Wilson said the company "intends to be pro-active in its response" to the proposed ordinance.

Company spokesman Ted O'Meara said previously that the ballot initiative unfairly targets a company that has consistently provided jobs and tax revenue for the city, as well as other benefits.

"Should we decide to develop our facilities further we have every confidence that the City of South Portland and other agencies would treat us fairly and consistently as they have in the past," O'Meara said in a prepared statement. "In the meantime, we ask that the community not discriminate against one of the top taxpayers and job creators in the city."

There is no proposal now to reverse the flow of the Portland-Montreal pipeline, which has sent crude oil through 236 miles of underground pipe into Canada for processing since the middle of the 20th century.

Although a previous proposal to use the underground pipe to move tar-sands oil out of western Canada was abandoned in 2008, the prospect has sparked enough interest and objection for the pre-emptive ban.

Proponents of the ordinance said that, to ship tar-sands oil from South Portland's waterfront, new equipment would have to be installed near the piers to handle and process the heavy oil, including two smokestacks that would emit the byproducts of handling the oil and preparing it for loading into tankers.

The proposed ordinance would more strictly define what is allowed, and specifically bar the unloading of crude for shipping north as the only permitted use in the waterfront zone. Supporters say the approach is backed up by case law and would stand up in court if oil companies challenged it.

As long as enough signatures are verified, the South Portland City Council is expected to take up the measure in July and hold a public hearing before it decides how to proceed.

The councilors could amend the zoning language, vote to adopt it as proposed and preclude a citywide vote, or let residents decide in November without changing the proposal. Blake said he expects the proposal to be sent to the ballot.

"The number of signatures speaks volumes," he said.

Matt Byrne can be contacted at 791-6303 or at:

mbyrne@pressherald.com

Were you interviewed for this story? If so, please fill out our accuracy form

Send question/comment to the editors


Additional Photos

click image to enlarge

Carol Masterson, a member of Concerned Citizens of South Portland, speaks at a news conference outside South Portland City Hall as the group announces that it has collected 3,779 signatures calling for a referendum on banning oil importation within city limits.

John Patriquin / Staff Photographer

click image to enlarge

Sydney Damian-Loring, 20, of South Portland, was among the more than 125 volunteers who helped gather signatures for a ballot initiative designed to bar Canadian tar sands crude oil from being shipped through the city’s port.

Photo by Matt Byrne / Staff Writer

 


Further Discussion

Here at KJonline.com we value our readers and are committed to growing our community by encouraging you to add to the discussion. To ensure conscientious dialogue we have implemented a strict no-bullying policy. To participate, you must follow our Terms of Use.

Questions about the article? Add them below and we’ll try to answer them or do a follow-up post as soon as we can. Technical problems? Email them to us with an exact description of the problem. Make sure to include:
  • Type of computer or mobile device your are using
  • Exact operating system and browser you are viewing the site on (TIP: You can easily determine your operating system here.)