Friday, March 7, 2014
By Alanna Durkin
The Associated Press
FREEPORT — Fire chiefs and lawmakers are working to protect the system of volunteer firefighting that has served rural America for more than a century but is threatened by an ambiguity in President Obama’s health care law.
Freeport Fire Chief Darrel Fournier is wary of how the health care law will affect his department’s budget and his roughly 50 volunteers.
The Associated Press
Small and rural fire departments from California to Maine, which has one of the country’s highest percentages of volunteer and on-call firefighters, rely on volunteers to avoid the cost of paying them to be on duty in between fighting fires.
The volunteers are considered employees for tax purposes, a classification that grew out of an ongoing effort to attract firefighters by offering them such incentives as stipends, retirement benefits and free gym memberships.
That leaves open the question of whether the volunteer firefighters fall under the health care law’s requirement that employers with 50 or more employees working at least 30 hours a week must provide health insurance for them. Fire departments say they can’t afford to pay for insurance.
“Most of these are operating on a shoestring budget – holding pancake dinners to raise money to put enough gas in the truck so they can respond to the next fire, the next medical call,” said Dave Finger, director of government relations for the National Volunteer Fire Council.
Faced with the cost of insurance, or being fined if they fail to provide it, departments would likely be forced to reduce the number of hours that firefighters can volunteer or to eliminate the benefit programs, officials said. That has both fire chiefs and lawmakers raising concerns.
Darrel Fournier, fire chief in Freeport, said his department is bracing for what could be significant costs under the health care law. He expects he’ll have to provide coverage for the five firefighters he employs part time. That would cost the town – and ultimately taxpayers – about $75,000, or a penalty of $150,000.
Additionally, in a busy winter with lots of fires, emergency calls and accidents, he said his roughly 50 volunteers could work more than 30 hours a week, meeting the threshold under the law that would require him to provide health insurance for them as well.
To avoid the penalty, Freeport could cut back on the number of hours that part-time and volunteer firefighters have to work. But that would mean finding more volunteers to make up the difference, something the department and others across the country already struggle to do, Fournier said. When he started in Freeport in 1972, there was a waiting list of 25 people. Now, after three months actively recruiting in the community, Fournier said he’s lucky that he’ll soon be interviewing nine potential volunteer firefighters.
“It’s pretty amazing how this law is touching different operations,” he said in an interview in Freeport’s brick firehouse, where yellow fire trucks and ambulances were lined up awaiting the next call. “I’m not sure everyone thought that through.”
The question is expected to be answered when the Internal Revenue Service releases final regulations this year before the provision takes effect in 2015. A Treasury spokeswoman said the department is taking the concerns into account as it works toward the final regulations, but wouldn’t comment on what they’re likely to include.
In the meantime, Maine’s U.S. senators are backing a recently introduced bill aimed at ensuring that volunteer firefighters and other emergency responders are exempt from the health care law requirement. Republicans point to the confusion as another example of the problems with the law, which has been plagued by a fumbled rollout and criticism over canceled health care plans.
“This is yet another adverse and unanticipated impact of Obamacare,” said Maine Republican Susan Collins.
(Continued on page 2)