June 12, 2013

Gardiner faces budget cuts, higher taxes as $8.7M proposal gets Wednesday hearing

By Paul Koenig pkoenig@centralmaine.com
Staff Writer

GARDINER — City councilors will likely face the option of cutting additional services or increasing the tax rate now that the state budget-writing committee has proposed a state spending plan with cuts to municipal aid.

The dilemma is a reversal from what city officials had been expecting for the last two months, following an April budget proposal by City Manager Scott Morelli with no cut to revenue sharing and no tax increase.

The city's proposed $8,738,596 budget goes to public hearing 7 p.m. Wednesday at City Hall.

In January, Gov. Paul LePage proposed eliminating revenue sharing for two years, but strong opposition from municipalities led Morelli and others to believe it wouldn't be touched.

"Unfortunately, we were all wrong," he said.

The most recently proposed state budget calls for cutting municipal sharing by about $75 million, a reduction from the $200 million cut proposed by LePage in his two year budget.

The cuts to revenue sharing will cost Gardiner around $177,000, according to Morelli.

He said council has to either cut that from the budget or raise taxes by that amount, leading to a tax increase of $.50 per $1,000 of assessed value.

This would mean a tax increase of about $73 for the average household in Gardiner, valued at $146,900.

Morelli recommends raising the tax rate to avoid cutting more services. His original proposal called for $618,000 in cuts to expenses. City Council will review the proposal tonight.

"There's a lot of bad choices that could be made by the council, but none of those will be my recommendation," he said.

Morelli is blaming the potential tax hike on the state Legislature, which will be reviewing the proposed budget in the coming days, including cuts to municipal revenue sharing.

"While our tax increase won't be what most other communities are facing, it's still not something that we want to have to do," Morelli said. "Unfortunately, it's easier for the Legislature to shift cost on a municipality."

"It's easier for them to pass this decision on to us than raise taxes themselves," he added.

The state gives a portion of its sales and income tax revenues to municipalities to supplement property tax revenue.

The budget endorsed unanimously by the Appropriations Committee restores about two-thirds of the total revenue sharing LePage proposed to cut, according to Jodi Quintero, a spokeswoman for House Speaker Mark Eves, D-North Berwick.

Gardiner Mayor Thomas Harnett said his primary concern with the state budget is that LePage proposed cutting revenue sharing, yet he says he's against raising taxes.

"I think the governor's repeated claim that he's not going to raise taxes, not going to raises taxes, is remarkably disingenuous," Harnett said.

LePage has vowed to veto the budget proposed by the Appropriations Committee because it includes tax increases — temporary increases on sales and the meals and lodging tax.

City councilors have previously discussed the importance of trying to avoid moving the city's tax rate over $20 per $1,000 of assessed value, so it's unclear whether they'll back Morelli's recommendation of increasing taxes.

The rate has held steady at $19.90 for the second year in a row.

Harnett said he doesn't know what council will do, but he thinks some councilors will be concerned about the potential of passing the $20 threshold.

"I don't think it's a ceiling that cannot be exceeded, but it's exceeded at some risk because we are trying to attract new residents to Gardiner," Harnett said.

The city has a higher tax rate than most surrounding communities, and some councilors have expressed concern that a higher rate will lead to more potential residents choosing to live elsewhere.

(Continued on page 2)

Were you interviewed for this story? If so, please fill out our accuracy form

Send question/comment to the editors

Further Discussion

Here at KJonline.com we value our readers and are committed to growing our community by encouraging you to add to the discussion. To ensure conscientious dialogue we have implemented a strict no-bullying policy. To participate, you must follow our Terms of Use.

Questions about the article? Add them below and we’ll try to answer them or do a follow-up post as soon as we can. Technical problems? Email them to us with an exact description of the problem. Make sure to include:
  • Type of computer or mobile device your are using
  • Exact operating system and browser you are viewing the site on (TIP: You can easily determine your operating system here.)