RACE FOR GOVERNOR

September 24, 2010

Forum clarifies candidates' divide

By Tux Turkel tturkel@pressherald.com
Staff Writer

PORTLAND — Four gubernatorial candidates outlined their positions on offshore oil drilling, power from Canada, wind farm development and strategies to lower electricity costs during a debate Thursday before a gathering of energy and environmental professionals.


The debate was held at the University of Southern Maine as members of the Environmental & Energy Technology Council of Maine watched and asked questions.


It sharpened the distinctions between the front-runner in polls, Republican Paul LePage, who favors less government involvement and regulation; and Democrat Libby Mitchell, who envisions a stronger role for government to encourage Maine’s transition to a green economy.


It also highlighted specific plans by Eliot Cutler, one of three independent candidates on the ballot, to create a public power authority to partner with industry to build lower-cost energy projects, and Shawn Moody’s small-business, high-efficiency focus.
The other independent candidate on the ballot, Kevin Scott, was unable to attend.


The next governor will lead a state where eight in 10 homes are heated with oil and high power costs have long been considered a deterrent to attracting and retaining business.


While he or she won’t be able to change those conditions single-handedly, that governor will appoint environmental and utility regulators and help set policy directions that will influence the price of energy and the development climate in Maine for years to come.


Questions for the candidates came from Jeff Thaler, an environmental lawyer and  the council’s co-chairman, who moderated the two-hour event; as well as audience members.


Maine’s Legislature has set ambitious goals for wind power development, both inland and offshore. The candidates were asked whether they support those goals. Only LePage said he does not, citing concerns about the need for backup generation when the wind isn’t blowing.


Moody said it makes sense to continue such investments. Mitchell, who helped draft the goals as Senate president, agreed. Cutler said he would like to see other ocean resources examined, in addition to wind. 


The merits of water power, here and in Canada, were discussed, as was the potential for drilling for oil and gas in the Gulf of Maine. Some of the responses sounded more symbolic than realistic.


For instance, Moody and LePage expressed the desire to develop and upgrade the state’s small hydroelectric dams. Roughly 18 percent of Maine’s 3,300 megawatts in generation capacity comes from water power. Thaler noted that small hydro plants produce only a fraction of that. LePage, however, said he favors them and added: “We keep taking our dams out.”


LePage’s reference was to the 3.5-megawatt Edwards Dam in Augusta, which was removed in 1999; and the 1.5-megawatt Fort Halifax Dam in Winslow, taken down in 2008. The state approved their removal to improve fish habitat, noting that they produced only about one-1,000th of the state’s demand.


Regarding offshore drilling, Mitchell, Moody and Cutler said they wouldn’t consider it. Cutler called the idea “absolutely nuts.”
 Thaler noted that Maine’s state geologist found no potential for oil or gas deposits in state waters. LePage, however, said he would “never say never.”


A discussion of the merits of Hydro-Québec proved to be of more substance and underscored a clear policy decision for Maine’s next governor.


The giant Canadian utility already has transmission lines to New York and New England. Maine’s last Legislature set up rules for developers that want to build new energy corridors through the state.


If Maine could negotiate low-priced contracts, LePage said, that would be “a no-brainer.” However, Mitchell pointed out that Canadian power could undercut Maine’s young renewables industry. It would be shortsighted, she said, to discourage the growth of local energy producers in favor of Hydro-Québec. Cutler took a middle position, saying Maine can’t act as an island that generates all of its own power and should import some power from Canada.


The candidates also had differing views on how to structure environmental regulation. In addition to the Department of Environmental Protection, Maine has a citizen board that reviews applications.


Mitchell wants to retain the Board of Environmental Protection. Cutler said the current process needs reform. LePage stood by an earlier statement that he would consider moving the functions of the DEP into the Department of Agriculture. Private owners are better stewards of a resource, he said, using Aroostook County farmers as an example.


The candidates also were asked whether they will support a $9.75 million bond question on the Nov. 2, ballot, which would attract matching federal money for land conservation. Only LePage said he would not.


“I look at bonds as another form of taxation,” he said.

Were you interviewed for this story? If so, please fill out our accuracy form

Send question/comment to the editors




Further Discussion

Here at KJonline.com we value our readers and are committed to growing our community by encouraging you to add to the discussion. To ensure conscientious dialogue we have implemented a strict no-bullying policy. To participate, you must follow our Terms of Use.

Questions about the article? Add them below and we’ll try to answer them or do a follow-up post as soon as we can. Technical problems? Email them to us with an exact description of the problem. Make sure to include:
  • Type of computer or mobile device your are using
  • Exact operating system and browser you are viewing the site on (TIP: You can easily determine your operating system here.)