July 24, 2013

Ex-Chelsea selectwoman received workers comp amid extortion and fraud charges

Federal government seeks to have at least $150,000 returned as part of the case against Carole Swan.

By Betty Adams badams@centralmaine.com
Staff Writer

Carole Swan, the former Chelsea selectwoman facing federal extortion and tax fraud charges, had been receiving around $50,000 annually from federal workers compensation, according to documents obtained by the Kennebec Journal through a public records request.

It was one of a number of payments Swan has received since she suffered a right shoulder-upper arm injury while employed by the U.S. Postal Service in November 1997, according to court documents filed in her case.

Now the federal government is seeking to have at least $150,000 of that money returned as part of the case against her. That is the amount she received between Aug. 1, 2008, and Feb. 29, 2012, the day she was indicted on federal fraud charges.

It is not clear from the public records whether Swan continues to receive federal compensation, though a document received through the records request says $50,639 is her “current salary.”

She is accused of extorting money from a town contractor while she was a Chelsea selectwoman and of fraudulently inflating the cost of a road project awarded to her husband, Marshall Swan, as well as fraud charges relating to income tax returns and the federal worker compensation benefits.

Swan, 54, who testified under oath in federal court in December that she was illiterate except for being able to read names and numbers, had worked previously as a rural carrier assigned to the Gardiner Post Office. She worked there from November 1982 until November 1997, when she transferred to the New Gloucester Post Office, according to Thomas P. Rizzo, a spokesman for the U.S. Postal Service.
The Kennebec Journal sent a public records request Dec. 10, 2012, to the Postal Service for details about Swan’s employment there. While the Jan. 16 response to the records request indicates Swan is employed at the New Gloucester Post Office, Rizzo said local Postal Service records say Swan’s employment ended July 31, 2008.

“Once an employee leaves employment with the Postal Service, we no longer play any role in the processing of payments,” Rizzo said.

The U.S. Department of Labor Office of Workers’ Compensation Program office monitors and pays employees in northern New England, he said. The Postal Service reimburses the program in what is known as “charge-back billings,” as do other federal agencies, Rizzo said.

“While the charge-back may show in our records, it should not be considered an active-duty status,” Rizzo said of Swan’s employment.

Four of the 17 charges in the federal indictment against Swan accuse her of making false statements on applications to collect that federal workers’ compensation money in July 2008, April 2009, May 2010, and May 2011. Swan has denied those charges and all the others brought by a federal grand jury a year ago.

Swan’s attorney, Leonard Sharon, would not comment.

Swan signed a sworn statement in which she denied working for any employer or being self-employed for the 24 months prior to July 2008 and for several years afterward, according to the federal indictment. “I do not work. I cannot work. I cannot even clean my own house or blow-dry my hair,” she wrote in May 2010.

On statements in April 2009, May 2010 and May 2011, Swan said she volunteered 1 1/2 hours every other week as selectwoman for the town “when in truth and in fact, as she well knew, she failed to report her ownership interest and her active participation in the operation of Marshall Swan Construction and a harness horse racing business, and her activities on the Board of Selectmen for the town of Chelsea,” according to documents filed by the prosecutor, Assistant U.S. Attorney Donald Clark.

(Continued on page 2)

Were you interviewed for this story? If so, please fill out our accuracy form

Send question/comment to the editors

Further Discussion

Here at KJonline.com we value our readers and are committed to growing our community by encouraging you to add to the discussion. To ensure conscientious dialogue we have implemented a strict no-bullying policy. To participate, you must follow our Terms of Use.

Questions about the article? Add them below and we’ll try to answer them or do a follow-up post as soon as we can. Technical problems? Email them to us with an exact description of the problem. Make sure to include:
  • Type of computer or mobile device your are using
  • Exact operating system and browser you are viewing the site on (TIP: You can easily determine your operating system here.)