January 16

Maine Medicaid expansion prospects brighten, Democrats say

Supporters say new, developing compromises may draw enough additional Republican votes to override a veto by Gov. LePage.

By Joe Lawlor jlawlor@pressherald.com
Staff Writer

AUGUSTA — While supporters and opponents of Medicaid expansion appeared to dig in during a long public hearing Wednesday, Democratic lawmakers said they could be on the brink of gaining enough Republican votes to pass an expansion bill and override an expected veto by Gov. Paul LePage.

click image to enlarge

Paula Sutton of Warren testifies against Medicaid expansion Wednesday before the Maine Legislature’s Health and Human Services Committee.

Joe Lawlor/Staff Writer

A similar bill failed last year when a vote in the House to override LePage’s veto fell three votes short. Just four Republicans voted with the Democratic majority to override the veto.

At least one moderate Republican, Sen. Roger Katz of Augusta, is now seeking ways to draw more Republican votes to expand Medicaid eligibility, which would insure an additional 70,000 to 100,000 Mainers.

“There’s lots of discussions going on inside and outside the State House,” he said. “Stay tuned.”

Rep. Richard Farnsworth, D-Portland, House chair of the Health and Human Services Committee, said he has heard from connected sources that two or three more Republicans may vote in favor of expansion.

He wouldn’t name any Republicans who voted against Medicaid expansion in 2013 but may be willing to vote for it this year, but said, “I believe we are making progress in bringing people along. ... There’s room for some additional compromises.”

David Sorensen, spokesman for the House Republicans, said the opposite is true, with more moderate Republicans skeptical of expansion, considering the added costs to the state detailed in a new report by a consultant hired by the LePage administration.

“I wouldn’t be optimistic if I were Rep. Farnsworth,” Sorensen said.

A bill before Farnsworth’s committee incorporates compromises fashioned last year by Katz, including a provision that would end the expansion in three years unless lawmakers vote to renew it.

The Affordable Care Act calls for 100 percent federal reimbursement for Medicaid expansion for the first three years, and 90 percent in subsequent years.

Katz said he is still working on compromises to draw more Republican support while preserving a bill that’s palatable to Democrats. “There ought to be some middle ground,” he said.

Katz said the ideas for compromise are “still in the early stages” so he’s not ready to present them, but they will focus on “core Republican principles.”

In broad terms, he said, he would like to see more “personal responsibility” in the Medicaid system, and he’s examining ways the state could limit Medicaid costs beyond the expansion.

“Other states do a much better job than we do of controlling costs. We could learn from them,” Katz said.

But he said it’s uncertain whether there will be enough votes for an override.

MORE ‘LISTENING’ ON EXPANSION

Jodi Quintero, spokeswoman for House Democrats, said several Republicans have spoken with Democrats and indicated they could be open to voting for a Medicaid compromise.

Sen. Patrick Flood, R-Winthrop, who voted for Medicaid expansion in 2013, said he’s not sure if a compromise plan would attract enough Republican votes for an override, but “I believe a lot of legislators are in listening mode.”

While a U.S. Supreme Court decision in 2012 allowed states to opt out of Medicaid expansion under the Affordable Care Act, several states with Republican governors, including Arizona and Ohio, have agreed to expansion.

A total of 27 states have approved Medicaid expansion or alternative plans, and other states are still debating whether to do so. Some states, including Arkansas and Iowa, have devised complicated workarounds that required federal approval.

A $925,000, taxpayer-funded report issued last week by the Rhode Island-based Alexander Group recommends against Medicaid expansion, saying it would be too costly to the state. The report’s conclusions are widely disputed by Democrats.

COSTS, BENEFITS DEBATED AGAIN

Mary Mayhew, the state’s health and human services commissioner, told the committee Wednesday that an expansion would be too expensive.

(Continued on page 2)

Were you interviewed for this story? If so, please fill out our accuracy form

Send question/comment to the editors




Further Discussion

Here at KJonline.com we value our readers and are committed to growing our community by encouraging you to add to the discussion. To ensure conscientious dialogue we have implemented a strict no-bullying policy. To participate, you must follow our Terms of Use.

Questions about the article? Add them below and we’ll try to answer them or do a follow-up post as soon as we can. Technical problems? Email them to us with an exact description of the problem. Make sure to include:
  • Type of computer or mobile device your are using
  • Exact operating system and browser you are viewing the site on (TIP: You can easily determine your operating system here.)