July 4, 2013

$120M Maine offshore energy project put on hold

Statoil, a Norwegian oil company, cites a new Maine law as the reason, because it overturns an agreement on electric rates the company will be allowed to charge.

By Steve Mistler smistler@pressherald.com
Staff Writer

AUGUSTA — A Norwegian company is suspending its proposed $120 million wind-power pilot project off the Maine coast, blaming the decision on a political maneuver employed to pass a sweeping energy law late in the legislative session.

click image to enlarge

Norwegian company Statoil had planned to install floating wind turbines off Boothbay Harbor that would be similar to this Hywind test turbine, now producing power off Norway.

Trude Refsahl / Statoil

Related Documents

Read Statoil's letter to the Maine Public Utilities Commission

The multinational oil and gas company Statoil notified the state Public Utilities Commission on Wednesday that it is halting development of Hywind Maine, a commercial-scale wind park with four floating turbines that would be installed 12 miles off Boothbay Harbor. In his letter to the commission, Statoil Vice President Johannes Nordli cited risks and uncertainty raised by passage of a law that reopened the bidding process to establish rates charged for power from the project. The company said it will re-evaluate the project this fall.

The state had already approved a rate proposal by Statoil in January. Gov. Paul LePage objected to that decision, saying the agreed-on rate was too high.

In June, LePage vetoed a sweeping energy bill, but urged Republicans to vote to override his veto if the Legislature first passed a law allowing the University of Maine to bid on the wind project.

Under Statoil’s plan, power would have been sent to the mainland by 2016 through underwater cables. Supporters of the project said it could make Maine a global leader in research and development of offshore wind power.

Democratic leaders said the law to reopen bidding was couched as a deal to benefit UMaine’s offshore wind development proposal, which would include two turbines to be built off Monhegan Island.

But the new law reneged on an agreement ratified in January when the Public Utilities Commission voted 2-1 to approve Statoil’s rate proposal. Democrats say the new law was motivated more by LePage’s opposition to wind power than a desire to help UMaine.

LePage has been a frequent critic of wind energy, saying it is too expensive. In 2012, he rejected a $20 million bond for offshore wind research and development that would have benefited the university.

On Wednesday, Senate President Justin Alfond, D-Portland, said the new law was “politics at its worst” and that it threatened the state’s potential to become a leader in offshore wind energy.

“This is a very sad day for the state of Maine,” he said.

The LePage administration countered that Statoil had already announced that it would delay the project while it waited to see if it won a $50 million grant from the U.S. Department of Energy.
Patrick Woodcock, the governor’s energy director, said Wednesday that the letter to the PUC raised other questions about Statoil.

“If they (Statoil) are so willing to jettison this project ... was this the best partner in developing an offshore wind industry in Maine?” Woodcock said.

Statoil said it is suspending the project because rate-bidding has been reopened. Nordli wrote that the company could not “continue to spend its resources on this project without certainty” that its previously ratified rate contract will be finalized.

Under the new law, that can’t happen until after the UMaine submits its bid in September – the university did not submit a bid three years ago when the PUC collected proposals.

In the interim, supporters of the Statoil project worry the company will take its project to another location – a possibility that Nordli referenced in his letter to the commission.

Democratic leaders blamed political maneuvering by the LePage administration. Alfond said Wednesday that Republicans in the Senate would have blocked the omnibus energy bill if the UMaine provision wasn’t passed, and to vote against the provision would have made it appear that Democrats were supporting a foreign oil company over UMaine.

(Continued on page 2)

Were you interviewed for this story? If so, please fill out our accuracy form

Send question/comment to the editors




Further Discussion

Here at KJonline.com we value our readers and are committed to growing our community by encouraging you to add to the discussion. To ensure conscientious dialogue we have implemented a strict no-bullying policy. To participate, you must follow our Terms of Use.

Questions about the article? Add them below and we’ll try to answer them or do a follow-up post as soon as we can. Technical problems? Email them to us with an exact description of the problem. Make sure to include:
  • Type of computer or mobile device your are using
  • Exact operating system and browser you are viewing the site on (TIP: You can easily determine your operating system here.)