December 1, 2013

Cony, CATC could drop accreditation

Augusta school officials say the voluntary stamp of approval is too costly.

By Susan McMillan
Staff Writer

AUGUSTA — When the regional accrediting agency put Cony High School on probation in 1998, Augusta Public Schools built a new high school and poured thousands of dollars and hours of staff time into fixing Cony’s status.

Now the school district is poised to give up accreditation of Cony and the Capital Area Technical Center willingly.

Accreditation through the New England Association of Schools and Colleges, or NEASC, is voluntary for high schools and indicates that a school’s curriculum, instruction, culture, physical space and equipment, testing and reporting meet standards set by NEASC based on research.

NEASC accreditation works on a 10-year cycle, with a visit by peer evaluators once per decade and a series of self-study reports prepared by the school staff in between.

Cony staff members said they have learned some valuable things during the process, but the value has not been in proportion to the expense and time commitment required.

CATC Director Peter Gagnon has similar complaints about the NEASC process for career and technical schools. Gagnon said it costs $67,317 in a 10-year period for annual membership dues, the peer evaluators’ visitation costs, additional staff time needed and other expenses. The cost is similar for Cony.

There’s a trend of schools looking for alternatives to NEASC accreditation.

A 2009 report by the University of Maine says 102 Maine high schools were accredited by NEASC at the time, but now there are only 92.

Gardiner Area High School is one of the latest to leave NEASC. Regional School Unit 11 officials said the accreditation process was too costly and rigid, with more attention paid to the building and staffing than what happens in classrooms. Gardiner’s accreditation status was also in jeopardy because there is no full-time librarian at the high school, as required by NEASC.

Enough local school officials have told the Department of Education that they’re interested in a state accreditation process that the department put out a request for proposals in September for a contractor to design such a process. No proposals were received, however, and state officials still are considering how to proceed, spokeswoman Samantha Warren said.

The Department of Education already has a review process for career and technical schools, which must be accredited to receive federal Perkins funding.

Most of Maine’s 28 career and technical schools use the state review process; the NEASC website lists only six, including CATC, that it accredits.

Gagnon said the state review would cost much less because Augusta would have to pay only for visitation costs and staff time. It also could be more relevant because the evaluators would be from Maine, not other New England states where career and technical education runs on different models.

The alternative review process proposed by Cony officials is one the school already has been engaged in for two years. Cony is a member of the League of Innovative Schools, a network of New England high schools that share ideas for improvement.

The league is a program of the Portland-based Great Schools Partnership. The three high schools in Hallowell-based Regional School Unit 2 also are members.

Cony staff members said many of the initiatives that they think have made the greatest positive impact in the last two years — such as a schedule with longer class periods, greater coordination between the junior high and high school, intensive SAT preparation and strategies for helping struggling students — have emerged from their work with the League of Innovative Schools.

“What we often find is that when it comes to answering these (NEASC) questions, the good, the reform, the things that we’ve done that we use to answer these questions have come from Innovative Schools,” Assistant Principal Stewart Brittner said.

(Continued on page 2)

Were you interviewed for this story? If so, please fill out our accuracy form

Send question/comment to the editors

Further Discussion

Here at we value our readers and are committed to growing our community by encouraging you to add to the discussion. To ensure conscientious dialogue we have implemented a strict no-bullying policy. To participate, you must follow our Terms of Use.

Questions about the article? Add them below and we’ll try to answer them or do a follow-up post as soon as we can. Technical problems? Email them to us with an exact description of the problem. Make sure to include:
  • Type of computer or mobile device your are using
  • Exact operating system and browser you are viewing the site on (TIP: You can easily determine your operating system here.)